Useful briefs, not magic phrases
These examples show details that are often missing. Adapt them to your actual task.
Improve an unsuitable answer with a focused follow-up
A dedicated page offers twelve repair templates for issues such as missing requirements, altered facts and incomplete code. Each card explains the inputs, success criteria and limits. Choose a template, add your original task and the previous answer, then create a follow-up prompt instantly.
These original templates have not yet been comparatively tested for answer quality. They do not perform an automatic content check.
Open the repair libraryNew: One topic or a whole batch
In “Multiple prompts”, use Create five learning questions about [TOPIC]. with Fractions, Percentages and Probability on separate lines to create three ready-to-use prompts. Select one to copy or download the batch and its review briefs as a text file.
For research, a template could be: Compare the benefits, limitations and open questions of using AI in [TOPIC]. Topics: Teaching, Workforce planning and Software development. Add shared criteria and a timeframe.
New: Instant additions and later review
The three switches by the result add an example, necessary clarifying questions or a restriction to your material. They immediately create a new version. Your chosen AI processes the task later.
Each prompt also comes with a review brief. Copy it after receiving your AI answer and replace the answer placeholder. This lets you ask an AI to check the answer against your requirements. AGIbeamer does not perform that review itself.
Guide to the three new featuresLearning material
Create eight conditional probability exercises for Grade 11, increasing in difficulty. Provide solutions in a separate section and show the essential calculations.
Useful details: topic, level, amount, difficulty and whether to include solutions.
Reviewing text
Review the following text for clarity and internal contradictions. Identify each specific passage, explain the issue and propose a correction. Preserve my intended message.
Useful details: audience, review criteria, tone and how extensively to edit.
Planning research
Compare these three options using the following criteria: [add criteria]. Prefer primary sources, state the date of the information and flag missing evidence. If you cannot research, provide a verifiable research plan.
Diagnosing code
This error occurs in this environment: [environment and error]. Expected behaviour: [behaviour]. Minimal example: [code]. Find the cause and suggest the smallest suitable change, including a way to check it.
Extra service: improve an answer
Already included: enter your original task, an existing AI answer and specific feedback. The builder turns these into a follow-up prompt. Your chosen AI performs the actual review.
Other useful services
- Source checking: A future service could open references and check whether they support the associated claims. This requires real research, not just templates.
- Comparing two answers: A short evaluation form could compare task completion, correctness and editing required.
- Breaking a project into steps: A dedicated assistant could turn a large goal into small, verifiable tasks.
- Education and editorial templates: Subject-specific forms could later complement LearnForReal and PreLearning with exercises, text reviews and study plans.
A link check only tests accessibility; the proposed source check would also compare the content with the specific claim. These four ideas are proposed extensions, not automated services implemented in this version.
More resources
JetztStarten · AI topics, sources and courses
Choose a starting point and continue
Task assistants · Requirements check · Learn with PunkteMachen
“Continue with this prompt” transfers the visible version to the improvement workflow. Review and confirm the import there.